Education 2.0 [wk49]

In September, my youngest daughter starts at school. This coincides with the first day of a new headteacher who has been promoted from within – her previous role was head of ICT.

We are already very happy with the school – our other two daughters go there, so the internal appointment offers a comfortable expectation of continuity.  But more topically, I am enthralled about the prospect of all my daughters being very computer literate. Not only is it a necessary skill, but also it can greatly enable teaching, depending on how the school chooses to use it.

The MBA has taught me that today’s technology enhances learning in many ways. The YouTube videos (thank you pajholden and others), the podcast lecture recordings (thank you Mark), the game/simulations on global supply chain management (thank you Canan), the online literature resource (thank you Cass and HBR), Google (thank you iOS) and these blogs are all example of how technology in and outside the classroom can explore a student’s optimal mix of learning style – i.e. whether we tend to learn best by doing, learning or seeing.

And yet it all seems to be a bit exploratory. Students are left to their own devices to find out what suits them best. We are postgraduates. I think that we should be able to cope. But what about kids? Are schools and software providers doing enough to help kids (and their parents) to help themselves? Is teaching due an IT-enabled transformation in light of all options? I think so. But this is not about access to laptops, or distance learning versus traditional learning; it is about the way IT is integrated into the learning experience.

In March, TED published an inspiring talk from Salman Khan, the creator of the Khan Academy. At 6.27 in the video, Khan asks for a quick pause before getting a round of applause. And that is exactly what I do, I hit pause and have a think about what he has just said. Khan Academy’s videos offer students the lecture before the class. Teachers can then “flip the classes”, assign the lectures as homework, and what use to be homework, can now be tackled in the classroom. That’s it. That’s the way I learn best!

I can rewind the Khan video and listen to that point again. I am learning at my own pace, and when I get into class, I am then fully ready to learn from doing, seeing and hearing from my peers, who have also been able to learn at their own optimal pace.

Bang! Education 2.0.

A mix of distance learning and in-class workshops, but none of it in a traditional sense. Next week, my wife also starts a new job at a local high school. I will be doing my best to spread the word.

Social media and information democracy [wk26]

Historically, companies have been able to control information. Today, in a time when user-generated information is growing exponentially, more often than not, companies have become mere observers.

This week, we tackled Social Media as the last part of ‘Marketing I’. In the session, it was suggested that the Internet (in all its guises) is going through a reincarnation, which embodies what it was originally set up to do.

The Internet started out life as a giant bulletin board for exchanging software, data, messages and news. Since the advent of group social media platforms, with their Web 2.0 and user-generated content features, the new incarnation has been perceived as a return to unadulterated content share – a democratisation of information, it has been said. But can two evidently lengthy words sit that close to each other?

Social media applications such as Facebook, YouTube and WordPress, of course, offer a wisdom-of-the-crowd model in which value is derived through mass collaboration. Their adoption is at the vanguard of a shift from broadcast to a many-to-many communication model, rooted in informal, conversational exchanges between authors and consumers. This would seem like a better world. Critics quickly point out that content should be evaluated on quality and its ability to inform, entertain, and/or illuminate truths. So how do we account for the use of popularity as such a dominant measure and judge in the social media environment?

I recall reading back in the summer of 2009 how the beginning of a street-led revolution in Iran got knocked off the top of Twitter’s trending topics by Michael Jackson’s sudden death. While social media as a medium for spreading democracy is a topic too far for this blog (sorry folks), this type of populism is very much part of the democracy that I know, trust or mistrust it.

One thing is for sure, the next few years will be fascinating for business and media alike. I hope I’ll still be blogging to document my ‘democratic view’ of what’s going on. This new media has opened a door for me to explore something that I love doing… constructing and publishing a current opinion. There are many people out there doing the same. The rise of these so-called ‘professional amateurs’ will no doubt change the landscape. And it does not feel bad. Although, I am sure the crowd can continue to group together and do bad (and good) things, much as they have always done. Perhaps that is the key democratic truth.

Blog at WordPress.com.
Theme: Esquire by Matthew Buchanan.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 36 other followers